The little cold crappy Jesuit-governed country of Sweden, where I happen to live, is very good at spewing out agenda-driven “politically correct” nonsense for brainwashed imbeciles, like this recent study featured by Medical Xpress on “correlation” between heart failure and “temperature extremes” going with the climate agenda hoax.
While the findings might very well be true, they are packaged in a way to support their evil prison state agenda while suppressing the real truth, the real underlying problems. Well, as I’m here to expose all their lies, let’s break this complete and utter nonsense down and set it right. Let’s start with what they are claiming.
“A multi-institution research effort led by Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health’s Center for Climate, Health, and the Global Environment reports that short-term exposure to both low and high ambient temperatures was associated with increasing cardiovascular mortality among Swedish patients with heart failure, with heat-related risk strengthening in 2014–2021.”
Very high and low temperatures are, of course, a stressor to the body. However, it is a stressor that we have adopted to tolerate through history as means of survival, living in nature and non-insulated houses without any electricity, air conditioning, and only a small fire for warmth or by simply sticking to the shade on hot days — natural things that have never caused any problems.
Our nomadic forefathers thrived in climates ranging from -40°C to +50°C (-40F to 122F) for hundreds of thousands of years without any modern equipment or high quality clothes.
“Climate change has increased the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events with direct implications for human health and mortality. Previous studies have identified low and high temperatures as key contributors to cardiovascular mortality.”
Climate change does not exist. It’s an agenda-driven hoax to further enslave the population by taxation and restrictions. The climate has always changed in cycles due to the movement of the sun and its intensity.
“In the study, “Short-Term Exposure to Low and High Temperatures and Mortality Among Patients With Heart Failure in Sweden,” published in JAMA Cardiology, researchers conducted a nationwide, time-stratified case-crossover study to investigate associations between short-term exposure to low and high ambient temperatures and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among Swedish patients with heart failure.
A total of 250,640 patients with heart failure who died from any cause between 2006 and 2021 were identified from the Swedish National Patient Register and the Cause of Death Register.
Researchers mapped daily outdoor temperature and air pollution to each participant’s home area on a 1 × 1 km grid using a machine-learning model. Local climate “low” and “high” temperatures were taken from the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles for each municipality.
Each death day temperature was compared with controls surrounding the death. Effects from the day of death and the six preceding days were analyzed together. A statistical model estimated risk across this seven-day window, using the temperature linked to the lowest mortality as the reference point. Researchers then estimated the proportion of deaths attributed to low and high temperatures.
Short-term temperature exposure showed a U-shaped relationship with mortality among patients with heart failure in Sweden. Mortality risk rose at both cold and hot extremes, with stronger effects at low temperatures.
Across 2006–2021, low temperatures increased all-cause mortality by 13% and cardiovascular mortality by 16%. High temperatures increased all-cause mortality by 5% and cardiovascular mortality by around 8% in the later years of the study.
Heat-related risk was greater during 2014–2021 than in 2006–2013. Men, patients with diabetes, and those using diuretics were more vulnerable to cold. Patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter and those exposed to higher ozone levels faced greater mortality risk during heat.”
First of all, temperatures have not changed by any significant numbers since 2006-2013 and 2014-2021. If we look at recorded temperatures by the government’s own institutions and 2006-2013 vs. 2014-2021 the “global” anomalies (NASA GISS, 1951-1980 base) averaged ~0.64°C for 2006-2013, creeping to ~0.91°C by 2014-2021 — an irrelevant 0.27°C nudge, within natural ENSO/solar variability cycles (e.g., PDO shifts.) Anthropologically, that’s a blip; our ancestors navigated 5-10°C interglacials without insulated homes or AC, fueled by nutrient-dense species-appropriate carnivorous food.
Also, their largest indication of correlation was with cold temperatures, something we always have had in Sweden as our country is located on the Scandinavian Peninsula in Northern Europe — placing much of the country well within the northern temperate zone and extending into the Arctic Circle. Northern Sweden lies in the subarctic and Arctic zones, characterized by long, harsh winters with temperatures often dropping below -30°C (-22F) and short, surprisingly warm summers. Even southern Sweden often experiences winters with temperatures below -15 to -20C (5 to -4F.)
However, there has been a constant decline in lifestyle and dietary factors since the 1950s, which has accelerated, especially in the 2000s, making the body more vulnerable to stress due to a higher toxic load and malnutrition. We also see more and more use of drugs and medications among adults and the elderly, severely damaging the body and increasing the toxic load. We also had a major policy shift that occurred in 2014, marking a structural change in how vaccination programmes were governed as The National Board of Health and Welfare (NBHW) lost jurisdiction over the national vaccination programme, which was transferred to the newly established Public Health Agency of Sweden (Folkhälsomyndigheten) — which is notoriously known for being run by Big Pharma imbeciles and shills.
Additionally, in 2012, the Communicable Diseases Act was revised, introducing a formal requirement for cost-effectiveness analysis in decisions about what vaccines to use, especially on the elderly population.
Also, the research cohort (250,640 heart failure patients, 2006-2021) was already a pre-selected population of metabolic wrecks — end-stage heart failure means compromised baroreceptors, erratic renin-angiotensin systems, and depleted cardiac reserves. Framing local percentile “extremes” (2.5th/97.5th temps per municipality) as novel killers ignores that these folks were already 99% on their way to the grave. Cold temperatures spike vasoconstriction (16% CV mortality bump,) ramping afterload on a failing left ventricle; heat dilates vessels/dehydrates, taxing dehydrated myocytes. But in a robust healthy human following our species-appropriate diet? Negligible stressor easily recovered from. And what about historical precedents? Zero heart failure die-offs from “extremes” — Viking sagas or Inuit oral histories detail blizzards and heat waves that they endured on seal blubber and caribou, with zero cardiogenic “heart failure shock epidemics.”
So, considering human physiology and our constant exposure to harsh weather through history, it’s very unlikely that some minor temperature changes would suddenly cause some people to die of heart failure. This has never happened in our anthropological history. It’s nonsensical.
Instead, it’s simple common sense and logical thinking that these poor people who succumbed to heart failure when exposed to temperature “extremes,” as in temperature changes, were very sick to begin with, as in having nutrient deficiencies and a high toxic load from a bad diet and the use of medications/drugs while likely detoxing from vaccines — and thus the stress from being exposed to either very cold or very warm weather was the drop that made the cup overflow.
So, to summarize, as even Grok AI agrees with, temperature fluctuations do not cause heart attacks or failures; these events stem from underlying metabolic damage caused by a plant-based and processed diet, lifestyle factors, drugs, medications, artificial and synthetic supplements, and environmental pollutants. Small natural changes in temperature that occur every hundred years or so did not suddenly cause people to die of heart failure, it is the sad state of humanity today with everything stated above contributing to poor health that causes some weak and sick people to die of heart failure due to the extra stress of being exposed to such temperature variations. Remove the offenders and nourish the body and you can handle normal weather changes with ease — as we have always done through history.
If you need help with any kind of health problems or transitioning from your current way of eating to our natural species-appropriate, species-specific way of eating, I’m available for both coaching and consultation.
Coaching and Consultation
And if you found the article and my insights helpful and enjoy my daily free information, please consider donating to help pay the webhosting bills and keep the site running. And if you’re interested in discussing and sharing information with likeminded people, consider joining our uncensored community at Ungovernable.se. Thank you!
