As the satanic sodomy ritual of Halloween is approaching, which some people celebrate for no logical reason at all, the Food-, Medical-, and Pharmaceutical shills at the atrocious website Medical X Press recently posted an article about “busting sugar myths” as a “Trick or Treat” feature — as millions of kids will be poisoned by idiots giving them candy and other processed plant-based chemically-enhanced crap.
Let’s see what these imbeciles lie about this time.
“The World Health Organization recommends that “free sugars” (sugar that is added to foods, plus sugars naturally present in honey, syrups and fruit juices) make up less than 10% of total energy intake, and ideally under 5%. That’s roughly no more than 10g per day for ages 1–2, 14g for ages 2–3, 19g for ages 4–6, 24g for ages 7–10, and 30g for ages 11+.
To put that in perspective, a small biscuit contains around 4g of sugar, a treat-sized bag of sweets about 13g, and a single lollipop roughly 10g. A successful trick-or-treat haul can easily push a child past their recommended daily limit several times over.”
Irrelevant as all types of carbohydrates turn into blood glucose which is the problem. As we know, any carbohydrate will elevate blood glucose above our natural safe level as maintained by gluconeogenesis and elevated blood glucose causes damage to all soft tissues including organs and also causes glycation to amino acids and fatty acids including LDL making them toxic and prone to cause plaque. Only seed/vegetable oils are more dangerous than consuming a lot of carbohydrates.
The evil World Health Organization know this, but in order to seem legit and as they care about health (which they do not, they want you enslaved,) they only focus on sugar as that is what people have been programmed with — and they know that most people don’t care anyways as it is a drug-like substance and most can’t give it up as they have no clue how damaging it is or how it feels to be healthy — they have nothing to compare their miserable life to, so they just carry on poisoning themselves all the way to an early grave.
“Parents often hear well-meaning advice from friends and relatives about sugar highs, crashes and restless nights. But research shows that the bigger concern isn’t what happens after a one-off binge, it’s what happens when children regularly exceed those limits. So let’s unpack some common beliefs.”
Let’s bring it on. And for fun, I will copy and paste my rebuttals into Grok AI while asking if it agrees with my statements or if it disagree and what it would respond based on purely reviewing all established and acknowledged literature and research within the fields of biology, anthropology, human physiology and biochemistry.
1. Sugar makes kids hyper
“Despite its persistence, this myth doesn’t hold up scientifically. Research finds little connection between sugar intake and hyperactivity in children. The idea largely stems from expectation bias: when parents expect sugar to cause excitable behavior, they’re more likely to perceive it.
Children are naturally energetic, and sugar is often consumed at parties, during trick-or-treating, or at other exciting events—so the myth reinforces itself.”
This Author, Rachel Woods, obviously has no knowledge of biology, human physiology or simple biochemistry. Yes, kids do get “overstimulated” from a large serving of toxic carbohydrates — or sugars, if you want to propagandize it.
I see this as common sense. I do not even need to look it up within biochemistry. Adults have more and larger muscle cells than children have for glycogen storage and also more and larger fat cells for storing excess energy from such consumption (triglycerides from carbs.) Also, children’s organs are not as mature and efficient at detoxification. So, in short, children can not handle an onslaught of elevated blood glucose from carbs/sugars as well as adults; so instead the body does it best to mitigate the damage by making children move around more to use some of that excess blood glucose as energy.
This is why very active adults, especially athletes, do not see the same amount of damage from carbohydrate consumption as they use up some of that toxic elevated blood glucose to fuel their muscles as they are more physically active. That is why children spontaneously become more active after a meal that has more carbohydrates or sugars than their small bodies could handle. Simple and common sense.
So, Rachel, you so-called “myth-busting” is off to a pretty poor start. Zero points thus far. Four more to go.
2. Sugar highs
“The “sugar rush” is another myth. Sugar does provide quick energy, but the body tightly regulates blood glucose levels, so there isn’t a genuine “high”.
Studies show that carbohydrates, including sugar, are not associated with mood improvements after consumption.”
Yes, the body does its best to regulate blood glucose levels. But a large intake of carbohydrates will still cause a lot of soft tissue damage and glycation and your body will try to mitigate this if you are still healthy enough. So, if you, as an athlete or a somewhat healthy human, ingest mostly carbs in a meal, you will likely get energized as the body will try to mitigate some damage through spontaneous activity and feeling energized from the stress response of high toxic glucose levels.
However, in an unhealthy human that already is stressed, as in most people and most people used in studies, the effect will be much less pronounced — and even more so if it is a mixed or balanced meal containing seed oils and other toxins as that will cause your body to go into a detoxification crisis which taxes the organs and you will likely feel tired instead, as in taking that famous pre-lunch nap.
As for mood improvements, it’s all about the context of the meal. A lot of carbohydrates/sugars have shown to alter brain chemistry causing both addiction and mood changes. So, if you’re used to carbohydrates, as in addicted due to changes in brain chemistry, you will experience an improved mood every time you consume them.
So, sorry Rachel, your poor understanding of human physiology keeps your score at zero. Three more to go.
3. Sugar crashes
“This one has a little more truth to it. After eating sweets, blood sugar rises quickly, then falls back to normal—and sometimes slightly below normal.
These fluctuations are part of normal physiology and don’t consistently cause noticeable effects.
In adults, carbohydrate consumption has been linked to increased fatigue and decreased alertness within an hour after eating, but these effects vary widely and are typically mild.”
I kind of explained this in my last answer. How you react to toxic carbohydrates depends on how damaged your physiology is. The longer you have been taking damage from carbohydrates and the less active you are, the worse it will be, as in getting so tired you want to take a nap or you might even experience blurred vision.
However, these fluctuations of blood glucose are not part of normal physiology as we are constructed to consume animal-based foods and be in ketogenesis where our body supplies us with all the glucose we need through gluconeogenesis.
So, again, the problem is not the physiological survival response by the body when you expose it to inappropriate food sources, it’s the fact that you expose it to these foods in the first place. Remove the offenders and your body will function as intended and previous damage will slowly heal.
I will give you half a point for this, Rachel. That’s 0.5 out of 3 and two more to go.
4. They won’t sleep tonight
“The evidence here is mixed. One small study found that 8–12-year-olds had more night wakings after a high-sugar drink before bed, while another in toddlers found no short-term effects. Overall, there’s no strong proof that a one-off sugar binge dramatically affects sleep.
Excitement, later bedtimes, and social stimulation around events like Halloween probably play a bigger role.
The long-term picture, however, is clearer. A meta-analysis found that high sugar intake in children is linked with shorter sleep duration. Another study of two-year-olds found that frequent consumption of soft drinks, snacks, and fast food (often high in sugar) was associated with more night wakings and poorer sleep.”
Again, this goes back to my first rebuttal, that of children not having the same body mass and organ maturity to readily mitigate the damage from elevated blood glucose. They can not store as much as glycogen, nor as fat mass as an adult can. So, instead the stress response instigates them to more spontaneous activity, often seen as being hyper active or simply having tons of energy and being a pain in the backside in the eyes of the parents who instead are tired and want to wind down.
So, of course this will affect their sleep, as the body is currently wired to use excessive blood glucose as fuel for muscle activity.
As for fast food and similar ultra processed foods, these are even more toxic, causing a highly toxic environment that is absolutely not ideal for sleep, especially if they eat close to bed as digestion can take 4 to 6 hours or more considering a mixed meal with carbs, seed oils and other toxins such as antinutrients, defense chemicals, artificial chemicals, and heavy metals.
And the excitement from different events will play a role, but that is only a few times a year and is totally irrelevant in this discussion. The problem is still that most children consume this crap year round and simply having a bit more during these feasts or events simply add insult to injury. Parents need to address the real problem, what they are feeding their kids on a daily basis.
I will give you another half a point for that one, Rachel. That’s a total of 1 out of 4 and one more to go.
5. If you restrict them, they’ll just want it more
“There’s some evidence that completely banning sweets can make children desire them more—but that’s about total prohibition, not setting boundaries.
In fact, research shows that children whose parents set consistent limits on sugary foods don’t develop stronger sweet preferences, and actually consume less sugar overall than children with more permissive parents.
Parents have a huge influence over eating habits by deciding what foods are available at home. Let’s be honest: kids aren’t thinking about metabolic health. They just know sweets taste good.
One night of Halloween indulgence won’t cause lasting harm. The real concern is habitual overconsumption.
Historical data from people exposed to sugar rationing during the Second World War suggests that lower sugar intake in childhood (and even in utero) is linked to reduced risks of diabetes and hypertension later in life.
Modern studies agree: high intakes of added sugars in childhood are associated with increased obesity, cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes, and even cognitive and emotional issues such as anxiety and depression.
And, of course, frequent sugar consumption also damages teeth.
High-sugar diets tend to be low in nutrients too, especially worrying for younger children with smaller appetites. When sweets and other energy-dense, nutrient-poor foods replace vegetables, fruits, whole grains, or dairy, children miss out on essential nutrients like vitamins, fiber, and calcium.”
That was long-winded, but at least pretty correct for once. However, you keep saying “sugar” instead of carbohydrates, which is the real culprit here. Again, all carbohydrates turn into glucose and will carry the same glucose load and damage, no matter if it’s deemed “fast” or “slow.” With that said, sugar is half fructose, which is a huge problem especially for younger children who have an even harder time metabolizing fructose. Still, the problem here is that we have deviated from our natural species-specific and species-appropriate diet. Any animal who does this will damage their physiology, as in developing diseases. We see this with all animals in captivity that are fed an inappropriate diet, however, we never see this in nature where the animal is free to eat what is appropriate for their species. The same goes for humans and even more so for children who are still growing and developing.
And yes, high-carb and processed foods are low in nutrients, but so are all plant-based foods as they store their nutrients in a different chemical form which requires bioconversion in the human body — and not to mention how much is tied up in fiber and to antinutrients. So, again, we come back to the underlying problem of a non-appropriate diet, a diet that will cause harm and manifest as what the medical establishment calls diseases.
So, you need to be strict with your children, as they should be what matters most to you and you want them to be healthy and strong. That is far more important than any “sweet tooth” or “whining” about sweets. Take responsibility!
Rachel, as you missed the mark on what real nutrition is and the importance of removing all plant-based and processed crap from your children’s diet, I will give you another half point — as you at least got most of what you wrote right, although it was really lackluster. So, you managed to get 1.5 out of 5 but not one single thing correctly right. Pretty bad. You better start looking for a more suitable career. This is not for you.
And that was about it. Rachel ended her article with the retarded statement “So yes—let them enjoy Halloween. The occasional sugar rush (real or imagined) isn’t the problem. It’s what happens every other day of the year that really counts.”
No, your children should not partake in satanic sodomy rituals based on consumerism and disguised behind the “reward” of poisonous toxic slave kibble. That is extremely irresponsible and damaging to the children.
Again, take some responsibility!
If you need help with any kind of health problems or transitioning from your current way of eating to our natural species-appropriate, species-specific way of eating, I’m available for both coaching and consultation.
Coaching and Consultation
And if you found the article and my insights helpful and enjoy my daily free information, please consider donating to help pay the webhosting bills and keep the site running. And if you’re interested in discussing and sharing information with likeminded people, consider joining our uncensored community at Ungovernable.se. Thank you!
