For many years, there has been an agenda to normalize being overweight, as it is extremely more common than being underweight and the governing elite want as many people to be weak, dumbed-down, docile, diseased and dependent on their toxic food industry and pharmaceutical solutions as possible. And if you are overweight, you are likely very toxic and unhealthy, which is exactly what they want. However, being underweight is not exactly healthy either, so let’s see what the nutters at Fox News had to say about this as they tried to summarize a new study comparing being “fat but fit” to being underweight.
“A major new study found that carrying a few extra pounds might not be as dangerous as being underweight, especially for those who are “fat but fit.””
A “few extra pounds” does not necessarily make you overweight and much less obese. Why are you being so conservative with your words? Are you not that confident in the findings?
And what exactly is “fat but fit?” Is there really such a thing? And is being “fit,” regardless of body composition, really a good and healthy thing?
Well, you can picture “fitness” as a scale or spectrum in your mind, as a line from red into green and then into red again. Being somewhat fit, as in the middle green is natural, as humans are made to move around, hunt and scavenge for leftovers of dead animals. However, being “fit” as in an elite athlete who exercises several hours every day is not normal and is an extreme stress on the body, and thus very unhealthy. So, we need to define a middle ground if we’re speaking about “fitness” and “health.” And more importantly, especially for health, is the diet.
“Researchers from Aarhus University Hospital in Denmark followed more than 85,000 adults and found that people who were underweight were nearly three times more likely to die during the study period than those at the high end of the normal body mass index (BMI) range.
Even participants within the “healthy” range, but on the lower side, faced a higher risk of early death.”
This is both logical and common sense. Being underweight can only be achieved by eating way too little food, as in starving (or in some cases due to severe illness.) And that equals nutrient deficiencies and that your body will struggle to keep its natural processes going, especially hormone production, tissue repair and detoxification. In other words, people who are underweight and do not change their diet slowly break down their bodies until they can’t keep up any longer, and they die. Not that hard to figure out.
Those with a higher BMI usually eat enough to maintain their weight or even gain weight, and thus they are less likely to develop the same severe nutrient deficiencies. On the other hand, if they consume anything plant-based and/or processed, they do instead have an increasing toxic load and a higher need of detoxification and tissue repair. So, neither of them are healthy, but being underweight and continuing to starve oneself will kill you a lot faster than the accumulation of toxic and damage from bad food.
“Meanwhile, those who were overweight or moderately obese did not face higher death rates compared to people with BMIs in the upper-normal range.
The findings challenge long-standing assumptions about BMI — a calculation using weight and height — and health, suggesting it may be possible to be “fat but fit” and that carrying a few extra pounds may not be as harmful as once thought, according to a press release.”
No, this has nothing to do with “being fit,” it’s simply the accumulation of tissue damage and toxicity. Those who are overweight but try to be somewhat “fit” usually eat better, but still consume too much food or binge on some processed garbage. Thus, they usually have less nutrient deficiencies, a little lower toxic load, and can detoxify and heal a little better. That has nothing to do with exercise, as in being “fit,” it all has to do with variations in the diet and different eating patterns. If someone who is overweight consumes more animal-based foods, he or she will be healthier than someone overweight who consumes less animal-based foods and mostly relies on plant-based and processed garbage. That is common sense as animal-based foods are the only source of bioavailable nutrients for humans while plant-based and processed foods are the largest contributor of toxins while providing virtually no nutrients at all.
“The greatest risk, however, came at both extremes: severe obesity and being underweight.”
Anything that deviates from our natural state, as in following our species-appropriate diet and being moderately active comes with several risks, as in causing toxicity and cellular damage.
“Obesity can disrupt the body’s metabolism, weaken the immune system and lead to diseases like Type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular diseases and up to 15 different cancers, while being underweight is tied to malnutrition, weakened immunity and nutrient deficiencies, Gribsholt warned.”
We do not have an immune system, you twat — as there are no such silly things as viruses or pathogens. That is pseudo-science and fear mongering. We have a detoxification and repair system, as in self-maintenance and healing, and that system is dependent on nutrients, preferable being in a fasted state for several hours every day, and not being overloaded by extreme amounts of toxins as we see in anything plant-based or processed, or in drugs, medications, natural remedies or supplements.
So, while obesity, as in the fat mass itself will strain the body, push on airways and organs, most of the “diseases” are caused by the diet that made you gain weight in the first place, as in overconsumption and especially carbohydrates, seed/vegetable oils, plant-based toxins, heavy metals, pesticide residues and other chemicals. Remember, fat cells do not only store excess energy, they store toxins as well when your detoxification abilities are hampered by a poor diet (nutrient deficiencies.)
And yes, being underweight usually equals even more severe nutrient deficiencies, as in being very malnourished, which will slow down and even stop bodily processes while the body consumes itself to keep up.
“Visceral fat — fat that is very metabolically active and stored deep within the abdomen, wrapped around the organs — secretes compounds that adversely affect metabolic health, said Jens Meldgaard Bruun, another of the study’s researchers.”
“As a result, an individual who has a BMI of 35 and is apple-shaped — the excess fat is around their abdomen — may have Type 2 diabetes or high blood pressure, while another individual with the same BMI may [be] free of these problems because the excess fat is on their hips, buttocks and thighs.”
Fat accumulation in specific areas are governed by two things; sex hormones and toxicity. Hormones can favor fat storage in areas like the chest, the upper arms, the abdomen or the love handles, and the buttocks and thighs. In other words, mostly subcutaneous fat, the fat you can see in the mirror. High toxicity, depending on the types of toxins, usually binds/attach to specific tissues including organs, glands and even lymphatic nodes. If you can’t detoxify these toxins, your body will either store them in fat tissue or encapsulate them in tumors to mitigate the damage and extend your life so you can turn things around by stopping the influx of these toxins (as in stop eating plant-based and processed garbage.) In other words, intra-fat (visceral fat) around organs and such are due to toxicity and tissue damage while “cosmetic fat,” the outer layer and its distribution is mostly governed by hormones.
This has been documented within the fields of biology, physiology and biochemistry, and should be common sense. Alas, that is something most researchers lack today as they are indoctrinated with modern medicine and the pseudo-science of “nutrition.”
So, while you can predict outcomes and problems by observing the distribution of fat, it’s not the fat itself that is the enemy. The enemy, the underlying problem, is what causes the body to protect itself by forming these fat deposits. And usually that is toxins from what you are eating, as in plant-based and processed foods, as well as environmental toxins from plastics, self-care products, pollution, etcetera.
“The treatment of obesity should be personalized to take these factors and other conditions into account when setting a target weight, Bruun said.”
No, as you do not understand the cause and effect, as in the underlying problem. The easy and quick fix is to eliminate as much of what is doing harm as possible, as in removing all plant-based and processed foods and replacing them with species-appropriate foods that are aligned with our obligate hyper carnivore nature, while also minimizing exposure to environmental toxins. This is the first step to fixing every single health problem.
As you begin to eat according to your physiology, you will be fully nourished and your body can begin to detoxify and heal. At the same time, by removing the toxic offenders, the toxic load is much less, allowing for actual progress. Simple and common sense.
After that, you can implement personalized strategies depending on the damage and the symptoms thereof.
“Dr. Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula, an epidemiologist at North Dakota State University who was not involved in the research, told Fox News Digital the findings support other recent research but challenge current medical guidelines that assume health risks rise steadily with BMI.”
“The higher death rates in people with lower BMI likely occur because hidden illnesses cause the situation to appear backwards,” Bhagavathula told Fox News Digital. “Diseases like cancer or heart failure cause weight loss first, which makes low weight seem more dangerous than it actually is.”
That is one retarded comment, as this is very rare, as in the people falling for the trap of medical treatment in severe stages of cancer or other “diseases.” The study in question was looking at ordinary underweight people and their risk of dying compared to overweight or obese people who tried to be “fit” and “active.”
“Bhagavathula added that, in older adults, age-related muscle loss increases vulnerability, such as to falls and infections, while mild excess weight may provide a “protective effect” by offering energy reserves during illness. Denmark’s healthy and active lifestyle, including widespread cycling, may also contribute to that effect.”
While sarcopenia can make you much more vulnerable to injuries and becoming more inactive as you feel weak and easily get fatigued, excess weight does not necessarily offer a reserve during illness. That all depends on your nutritional status and how toxic your fat is. If you have been eating some animal-based foods and your nutritional stores are adequate, that extra fat can be used as fuel if you become sick and have trouble eating — thus being beneficial. However, if you mostly have been eating crap and already have nutrient deficiencies and you have stored a lot of toxins in that fat tissue, these toxins will be released when the fat is used up as energy, which can make you much worse and even kill you if you’re extremely unhealthy and weak.
If you consider yourself an expert, you have to be able to see and predict multiple outcomes depending on differences between people. And the first step is always to evaluate and backtrack their diet and other lifestyle habits.
“Current health messaging often focuses too heavily on weight loss, creating shame and unnecessary medical treatment for people who are overweight but have normal body function,” he continued. “These findings suggest shifting toward a nutrition approach that focuses on how the body processes food, emphasizing physical activity, balanced eating and blood tests … rather than BMI alone.”
The truth is that being overweight is not a natural state. It is impossible to become overweight if you follow our natural species-appropriate diet. Fat accumulation is mostly from overconsuming carbohydrates and seed/vegetable oils, both which are toxic and unnatural for humans. Same with an elevated toxic load. It is impossible to achieve this on a natural diet.
We need to focus on the real problem, that of the extreme misinformation about human nutrition and that of easily available plant-based processed food.
If you need help with any kind of health problems or transitioning from your current way of eating to our natural species-appropriate, species-specific way of eating, I’m available for both coaching and consultation.
Coaching and Consultation
And if you found the article and my insights helpful and enjoy my daily free information, please consider donating to help pay the webhosting bills and keep the site running. And if you’re interested in discussing and sharing information with likeminded people, consider joining our uncensored community at Ungovernable.se. Thank you!
