As most of you should know by now, the inverted “science” of nutrition is pure hijacked bollocks — driven by an agenda to keep you weak, sickly, docile, dumbed-down, and dependent on their system and Big-Pharma solutions while the food industry make billions on totally useless cheap plant-based garbage.
So, this ridiculous study comes at no surprise, and neither does Examine.com’s summary of it.
Quick Summary
In this randomized crossover trial, older adults were served breakfast meals containing either beans or beef to find out the impact on satiety and subsequent calorie intake.
Key study details
“The 35 participants (average age of 72) consumed 3 breakfast tortilla meals, which included either black beans (135 grams), red kidney beans (135 grams), or extra-lean ground beef (80 grams).”
Are you kidding me? Tortilla meals? As in a toxic carb-ridden flatbread filled with either beans or ground beef. And even worse, “extra-lean” ground beef?! The fatter the meat, the more nutrients it contains, especially the very important animal fats and fat-soluble vitamins. Using “extra-lean” simply shows that you either are completely unaware of human physiology and biochemistry, or that you try to manipulate the outcome of the study, as “extra-lean” meat is a lot less filling than fattier meat. And also, only a puny 80 grams? That’s nothing for an adult, especially if it is “extra-lean.” Also, it’s interesting that the toxic bean slop weighed in at 135 grams, making those meals larger and taking up more space in the stomach. Very sneaky.
Well, what a clown-show! Not only will you get a blood sugar roller-coaster response from the carb-filled tortilla affecting appetite and cravings a few hours later, the “extra-lean” beef will simply translate into a protein source with a little bit of vitamins and minerals, while the beans with all it’s extremely harmful toxins and fiber will clog you up and blunt appetite for a while due to acute poisoning as your body tries to deal with the toxic load. But since even “ultra-lean” beef is a thousands times more nutritious than toxic beans, and also completely free of toxins, the “satiety” should be about the same, although from completely different mechanics, especially considering the carbohydrates from the tortilla which will trigger the urge to eat more a few hours later, especially if fat was low in that meal (which is was.)
“Subjective appetite was assessed up to 180 minutes after breakfast, and then an ad libitum pizza lunch was eaten. The participants then went home and measured everything else that they ate. There was a washout period of at least a week between the test days.”
A frikkin’ pizza for lunch? What is this? Are they trying their best to kill these poor 70-plus-year-old people?
Also, these “research” methods as in “subjective appetite” and “self-measuring” what they ate later in the day are not what I would call reliable sources of data. Still, let’s see where this is going…
“Appetite after breakfast did not differ between the groups, and neither did energy intake at lunch or total daily energy intake (which includes the calories consumed at breakfast, lunch, and at home).”
Kind of what I suspected as they used “extra-lean beef,” likely to make the extremely toxic beans look better in their staged and utterly retarded “randomized crossover trial.”
If the subjects would have had real fatty beef, they would, without a question, have eaten a lot less at lunch as they would have had much more nutrients in their bodies, and hunger is mostly governed by nutrient requirement, availability or lack thereof.
Examine.com’s take
“Protein and fiber have both been extensively studied for their satiety-promoting effects. There was more protein in the beef breakfast than the bean breakfasts (35 vs. 21 grams), but the bean breakfasts contained more fiber (12 vs. 2 grams). The findings suggest that the higher fiber content of beans compensated for the lower protein content, resulting in a similar satiety-promoting effect.”
Protein will only be a temporary “band-aid” if you are nutrient deficient and crave several meals a day, as in getting hungry again within a few hours after a meal. And fiber is extremely unnatural and very damaging to our intestines as we do not have a large colon that is built for fermentation, as seen in herbivores and even some omnivores. Remember, humans are obligate hyper carnivores. We are made to only consume animal-based foods. That is simple biology and physiology.
So, while both protein and fiber can be a temporary band-aid in “hunger management” it is from two different mechanics. Protein is considered more satiating than other macronutrients due to its effects on hormones and signaling pathways in the body as it is used for tissue repair and also to make said hormones. Protein also activates anabolic signaling pathways (mTOR) and suppresses catabolic signaling pathways (AMPK,) which can temporarily reduce food intake by acting on the hypothalamus. Again, the effect is very temporary if you are nutrient deficient, as in a few hours.
Fiber on the other hand is simply indigestible and sits in your colon acting like barb-wire causing bloating and severe damage. I’ve covered the extreme damage caused by fiber in my articles “Fiber is NOT needed in the human diet” and “Fiber Is Extremely Damaging And Not Needed in Any Diet.”
Also, anything plant-based that contains a lot of fiber also contains a lot of antinutrients, defense chemicals, heavy metals and pesticide residues, making it extremely toxic, which will also temporarily blunt hunger as your body experiences a stress response of acute poisoning. Remember, beans, just as seeds, are the most toxic part of any plant. And this is why you can see an increase in heart rate and stress indicators whenever you consume anything plant-based, especially carbohydrates, while there is no such stress response when you consume animal-based foods, especially if you are fat adapted and in our natural state of ketosis. If you own a “health tracker” device, this is easy to monitor and verify on your own.
To conclude, this study was botched from the start, either by complete ignorance or by an attempt to skew the result. Still, even a measly 80 grams of “extra lean” beef with it’s superior nutrient density compared to anything plant-based were enough to inflict the same level of satiety as an acute-stress response from poisoning the body with toxic beans, which will really shut down your appetite while the body struggles to reestablish homeostasis.
Also, the only way to control appetite and remove all cravings and “hunger pangs” is by addressing the cause, as in addressing the nutrient deficiencies and the toxic load. And the only way to do this is by nourishing yourself, and since humans are obligate hyper carnivores, this can only be done by removing the toxic plant-based garbage from your diet and getting enough animal-based foods, as in fatty meat and the occasional organ meats and eggs.
For more on this subject, please take a look at my articles “If You Get Hungry, You’re Doing it Wrong!,” “All About Ghrelin, Hunger, Cravings, and Starvation,” “Fat Loss 101: Leptin And Hunger Is Not An Issue If You’re Fat Adapted And Fully Nourished,” “More Appetite Suppressant Nonsense: Oatzempic Challenge,” “Bombesin: More Nonsense About ‘Appetite Neurohormones’ To Sell You Dangerous Drugs,” “The Habenula, Mental Health, Food Cravings And Nutrition,” and “Carbohydrate Cravings In Depression Because Of A Broken Metabolism (Explaining The Importance Of A Natural Human Diet).”
If you need help with any kind of health problems or transitioning from your current way of eating to our natural species-appropriate, species-specific way of eating, I’m available for both coaching and consultation.
Coaching and Consultation
And if you found the article and my insights helpful and enjoy my daily free information, please consider donating to help pay the webhosting bills and keep the site running. And if you’re interested in discussing and sharing information with likeminded people, consider joining our uncensored community at Ungovernable.se. Thank you!
